Journal of Modern Psychology

Journal of Modern Psychology

The Mediating Role of We-ness in the Relationship between Primary Object Relations and Ego Strength with Marital Stability

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
1 Ph.D. in Counseling, Department of Psychology, Qo.C., Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Clinical Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Medical Branch, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Qo.C., Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran
Abstract
Objective: The present study aims to investigate the factors influencing marital stability, considering the mediating role of we-ness.
Methods: The research method was descriptive-correlational study employed structural equation modeling (SEM) and and the statistical population was all married individuals residing in Varamin and Pishva cities in 2025. Using a purposive sampling method, 388 participants were selected. Data was collected using the following standardized questionnaires: the Marital Instability Index (MII), the Bell Object Relations Inventory (BORI), the Ego Strength Scale (ESS), and the We-ness Questionnaire (WQ). Data analysis was performed using structural equation modeling and correlation tests.
Results: The final model demonstrated an acceptable fit to the data, with indices such as RMSEA = 0.076 and CFI = 0.899. All observed variables loaded significantly onto their respective latent constructs, with factor loadings exceeding 0.3 (p < .05). In addition, the mediating role of we-ness in the indirect relationship between primary object relations and ego strength with marital stability was confirmed.
Conclusion: The results highlight the importance of primary object relations and ego strength, as well as the key role of we-ness as an influential mechanism on marital stability. Consequently, designing educational interventions for parents (particularly mothers) focusing on primary object relations and fostering a sense of we-ness could contribute to enhanced marital durability.
Keywords
Subjects

Abbasi, L., Azadfallah, P., Fathi-Ashtiani, A., & Farahani, H. (2021). The relationship between dimensions of object relations and marital satisfaction. Clinical Psychology and Personality, 19(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.22070/cpap.2021.3095
Amato, P. R., & Rogers, S. J. (1997). A longitudinal study of marital problems and subsequent divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59(3), 612–624. https://doi.org/10.2307/353949  
Bayani, B., Jafari, A., Shafiabadi, A., & Hosseinian, S. (2023). A prediction model of borderline personality disorder based on complex trauma and object relations with the mediating role of self-empowerment in conflicted couples [Application article]. Applied Family Therapy, 4(5), 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.aftj.4.5.1
Bell, M. (1995). Bell Object Relations and Reality Testing Inventory (BORRTI) manual. Western Psychological Services.
Besharat, M. A. (2017). Development and validation of ego strength scale: A preliminary study [Research]. Journal of Psychological Science, 15(60), 445–467. http://psychologicalscience.ir/article-1-163-fa.html  
Booth, A., Johnson, D., & Edwards, J. N. (1983). Measuring marital instability. Journal of Marriage and Family, 45(2), 387–394 https://doi.org/10.2307/351516
Booth, A., Johnson, D. R., White, L. K., & Edwards, J. N. (1985). Predicting divorce and permanent separation. Journal of Family Issues, 6(3), 331–346.    https://doi.org/10.1177/019251385006003005
Cheraghi, M., Mazaheri, M. A., Mootabi, F., Panaghi, L., Sadeghi, M., & Salmani, K. (2017). Family triad systemic scale: An instrument for assessment of relationships between couples and families of origin. Journal of Family Research, 13(3), 343–360.   http://jfr.sbu.ac.ir/article/view/16210           
Cruwys, T., South, E. I., Halford, W. K., Murray, J. A., & Fladerer, M. P. (2023). Measuring “we‐ness” in couple relationships: A social identity approach. Family Process, 62(2), 795–817.
Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2021). Marriage in the new millennium: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 630–649. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00722.x      
Frederick, C. (2013). The center core in ego state therapy and other hypnotically facilitated psychotherapies. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 56(1), 39–53  https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2012.747950
Graziano, V., & Trogal, K. (2017). The politics of collective repair: Examining object-relations in a postwork society. Cultural Studies, 31(5), 634–658.   https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2017.1298638
Hadinejad, H., Tabatabaiian, M., & Dehghani, M. (2014). A preliminary study of the validity and reliability of Bell's Subjective Relations and Reality Check Questionnaire. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, 20(2), 162–169.  https://www.sid.ir/paper/17110/en 
Jafari, F. (2009). Examining the relationship between attachment styles and resilience with marital stability in couples in Tehran [Master’s thesis, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch].[Persian] Iran Doc.  https://irandoc.ac.ir
Jalovaara, M., & Kulu, H. (2018). Separation risk over union duration: An immediate itch? European Sociological Review, 34(5), 486–500.  https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcy017
Javadi Koma, A., Niknam, M., Sadeghi Afjeh, Z., & Mirzakhani, N. (2024). Developing a causal model for predicting marital instability based on dark personality and ego strength with the mediation of empathy in married women. Rooyesh-e-Ravanshenasi Journal (RRJ), 13*(2), 109–120.  http://frooyesh.ir/article-1-4586-fa.html 
Kahraman, S., & Aktan, E. A. (2024). The Relationship Between Object Relations and Relationship Satisfaction, Marital Adjustment, and Sexual Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Narcissistic and Borderline Personality Traits. OPUS Journal of Society Research, 21(3), 189 203. https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1472521
Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3
Kline, R. B., (2010), Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, NY: Guilford Press
Mohsenikabir, M., Kiamanesh, A., Poursharifi, H., & Masheikh, M. (2021). The mediating role of sexual satisfaction in relation between expressive and instrumental behavior and marital satisfaction in divorce applicants. Journal of Assessment and Research in Applied Counseling, 3(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/https://sid.ir/paper/1091722/en
Mortazavi Karimabad, F. S., & Karami, A. (2025). The roles of object relations, paranoid thoughts and interdependence in the stability of married women’s life (Mashhad City). Journal of Woman and Family Studies, 12(4), 47–61.  https://doi.org/10.22051/jwfs.2025.46791.3077
Özgülük Üçok, S. B., Onaylı, S., & Aydogan, D. (2025). We Are Together, but How Much Are We Truly ‘We’?: A Dyadic Approach With Turkish Emerging Adults. Emerging Adulthood, 13(6), 1445-1460. https://doi.org/10.1177/21676968251369900
Piao, X., Ma, X., Zhang, C., & Managi, S. (2020). Impact of gaps in the educational levels between married partners on health and a sustainable lifestyle: Evidence from 32 countries. Sustainability, 12(11), 4623. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114623 
Rahmati, B., Farahbakhsh, K., Motamedi, A., & Borjali, A. (2020). The "Weness" Evolution model in Successful Couples Based on Grounded Theory. Conseling researches, 75(19), 252-289. https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/1717458
Vedes, A., Bodenmann, G., Nussbeck, F. W., Randall, A., & Lind, W. (2015). The role of we-ness in mediating the association between dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction. Manuscript submitted for publication. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236330939_ The_role_of_weness_in_mediating_the_association_between_dyadic_coping_and_relationship_satisfaction_submitted

Yaripour, A. (2011). The effect of family counseling interventions on divorce rates in Qom province courts] [Doctoral dissertation, Islamic Azad University]. GIGA.  https://portal.giga.ac.ir

Westland, J. Christopher. (2010). Structural Equation Models. Springer Cham.

  • Receive Date 19 October 2025
  • Revise Date 03 November 2025
  • Accept Date 04 December 2025