Journal of Modern Psychology

Journal of Modern Psychology

Factors Influencing Decision-Making for Oocyte Cryopreservation and Its Psychosocial Consequences: A Phenomenological Study

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
Atefeh Arabi 1
Hoda Zaraj 2
Samane Someeloo 1
Razieh Esmaeili 3
1 PhD student in Health Psychology, Department of Counseling and Psychology, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 PhD student in health psychology, Department of Psychology, Caspian International Campus, University of Tehran, Tehran , Iran
3 PhD student in health psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Tehran, Tehran , Iran
10.22034/jmp.2025.554995.1149
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to explore women’s lived experiences regarding the psychosocial consequences of oocyte cryopreservation.
Methods: A descriptive phenomenological approach was adopted. Through employing purposive sampling, 15 women with oocyte cryopreservation experience were selected. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using Colaizzi’s seven-step method. The study’s population consisted of women aged 26–40 years who had undergone oocyte cryopreservation. Purposive sampling was employed to recruit participants from obstetrics and gynecology centers specializing in fertility preservation.
Findings: The analysis revealed two main categories: psychological consequences and social consequences. Psychological consequences included five subcategories: anxiety, reduced fear of the future, mental order, reduced financial worries, and decreased psychological pressure. Social consequences comprised three subcategories: criticism and opposition from others, cultural pressures, and social role and identity.
Conclusion: The findings indicated that women who chose oocyte cryopreservation generally made informed decisions and experienced relative internal satisfaction. However, they often faced social challenges, including cultural resistance and opposition from their social circles. It is essential to promote broader cultural awareness and acceptance to reduce social interference and support women’s autonomous reproductive choices.
Keywords
Oocyte Cryopreservation
Psychological Consequences
Social Consequences
Subjects
Brambillasca, F., Guglielmo, M. C., Coticchio, G., Mignini Renzini, M., Dal Canto, M., & Fadini, R. (2013). The current challenges to efficient immature oocyte cryopreservation. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 30(12), 1531–1539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-013-0109-8
Cao, B., Qin, J., Pan, B., Qazi, I. H., Ye, J., Fang, Y., & Zhou, G. (2022). Oxidative stress and oocyte cryopreservation: Recent advances in mitigation strategies involving antioxidants. Cells, 11(22), 3573. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11223573
Chronopoulou, E., Raperport, C., Sfakianakis, A., Srivastava, G., & Homburg, R. (2021). Elective oocyte cryopreservation for age-related fertility decline. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 38, 1177–1186.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02119-y
Chung, E. H., Lim, S. L., Myers, E., Moss, H. A., & Acharya, K. S. (2021). Oocyte cryopreservation versus ovarian tissue cryopreservation for adult female oncofertility patients: A cost-effectiveness study. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 38(9), 2435–2443.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02265-3
Giannopapa, M., Sakellaridi, A., Pana, A., & Velonaki, V. S. (2022). Women electing oocyte cryopreservation: Characteristics, information sources, and oocyte disposition: A systematic review. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, 67(2), 178–201.
 https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13323
Jones, B. P., Kasaven, L., L'Heveder, A., Jalmbrant, M., Green, J., Makki, M., ... & Ben Nagi, J. (2020). Perceptions, outcomes, and regret following social egg freezing in the UK; a cross‐sectional survey. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 99(3), 324–332.
 https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13763
Lee, S. S., Sutter, M., Lee, S., Schiffman, M. R., Kramer, Y. G., McCulloh, D. H., & Licciardi, F. (2020). Self-reported quality of life scales in women undergoing oocyte freezing versus in vitro fertilization. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 37, 2419–2425.
 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01888-2
Özöztürk, S., & Çiçek, Ö. (2024). Factors affecting the decisions of women considering oocyte cryopreservation: A blog study. Health Care for Women International, 45(1), 101–112.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2022.2113707
Pai, H. D., Baid, R., Palshetkar, N. P., Pai, A., Pai, R. D., & Palshetkar, R. (2021). Oocyte cryopreservation–Current scenario and future perspectives: A narrative review. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, 14(4), 340–349. https://doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_154_21
Seyhan, A., Akin, O. D., Ertaş, S., Ata, B., Yakin, K., & Urman, B. (2021). A survey of women who cryopreserved oocytes for non-medical indications (social fertility preservation). Reproductive Sciences, 28(8), 2202–2208.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00472-y
Simopoulou, M., Sfakianoudis, K., Bakas, P., Giannelou, P., Papapetrou, C., Kalampokas, T., ... & Koutsilieris,M. (2018). Postponing pregnancy through oocyte cryopreservation for social reasons: Considerations regarding clinical practice and the socio-psychological and bioethical issues involved. Medicina, 54(5), 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina54050076
Stevenson, E. L., Gispanski, L., Fields, K., Cappadora, M., & Hurt, M. (2021). Knowledge and decision-making about future fertility and oocyte cryopreservation among young women. Human Fertility, 24(2), 112–121.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2019.1615112
Tharasanit, T., & Thuwanut, P. (2021). Oocyte cryopreservation in domestic animals and humans: Principles, techniques and updated outcomes. Animals, 11(10), 2949. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11102949
Tsafrir, A., & Hyman, J. H. (2023). Planned oocyte cryopreservation: Social aspects. In Hot Topics in Human Reproduction: Ethics, Law and Society (pp. 131–140). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24903-7_11
Van de Wiel, L. (2020). Freezing Fertility: Oocyte Cryopreservation and the Gender Politics of Aging. New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479804661.001.0001
Walker, Z., Lanes, A., & Ginsburg, E. (2022). Oocyte cryopreservation review: Outcomes of medical oocyte cryopreservation and planned oocyte cryopreservation. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 20(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-021-00882-2
Wang, A., Pasch, L., Holley, S., Huddleston, H. G., & Jaswa, E. G. (2021). Anxiety and depression in patients undergoing oocyte cryopreservation and infertility. Fertility and Sterility, 116(3), e360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.07.964
Whaley, D., Damyar, K., Witek, R. P., Mendoza, A., Alexander, M., & Lakey, J. R. (2021). Cryopreservation: An overview of principles and cell-specific considerations. Cell Transplantation, 30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963689721999617
Yee, S., Goodman, C. V., Fu, V., Lipton, N. J., Dviri, M., Mashiach, J., & Librach, C. L. (2021). Assessing the quality of decision-making for planned oocyte cryopreservation. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 38, 907–916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02086-4

  • Receive Date 23 June 2025
  • Revise Date 20 July 2025
  • Accept Date 29 December 2025